Please support Ave Maria Radio's online only drive!

Ave Maria Radio's Online Only Membership Drive

Ave Maria Radio is conducting an online only membership drive this month aimed at raising much-needed funds and increasing its membership numbers. The goal is to get at least 250 new people to pledge their support and join a growing army of members who are making Ave Maria Radio a national powerhouse for the proclamation of the Gospel and the teachings of the Catholic Church. By becoming a new member, you can be a part of this spirited movement of faith that broadcasts the salvation of Christ to people around the globe each and every day.

If everyone visiting this website made a tax-deductible donation right now – and there are hundreds of thousands of you – Ave Maria Radio would certainly meet its financial goals for the year in just 29 days! Think about it – the more you’re able to give, the nearer Ave Maria Radio gets to achieving its goals.

So do it now. Let’s put more people on the pathway to heaven. Become a new member today! Just click the donate button and make a difference! Stay tuned to this page to see our progress as the Ave Maria Radio online-only membership drive continues.

Please use the form below to contribute to Ave Maria Radio’s February Online Membership Drive.

NOTE: The form on this page is located on a secure site. If you wish to make a monthly recurring donation below, please insert only the monthly payment amount and not the total annual pledge amount into the Donation Amount field below. Also, please indicate if your pledge is for one year only in the Additional Information field. Your donations to Ave Maria Radio are fully tax deductible. You will receive an annual statement in January of each year for your donations.

If you have any problems with or questions about this form, or if you need to make a change to your existing recurring credit card donation, please contact Tony Gerring, Director of Advancement Services, at 734-930-4528 or email him at: [email protected].


The Ypsilanti Courier

August 24, 2013

By Al Kresta

Re: Joseph Yelick’s piece on Saturday debate, Is Islam a Religion of Peace?

As the sponsor and moderator of Saturday’s “Is Islam a Religion of Peace?” debate, I thank Mr. Yelick for actually including some quotations from the debate. However, I must take him to task on two important points.

First: While we had “a frank, no-holds barred debate” as I predicted, it was in no way “raucous” as Mr. Yelick claims. There were no catcalls, no clamoring for red meat, no haranguing and not even a single heckler. Laughter, not anger or fear, was the most commonly expressed public reaction during the talks. Nobody was the butt of crude jokes. All the humor was edifying and self-effacing.

Everyone I spoke to, Muslim and Christian, were impressed by the tone of the debate and the bearing of the audience and debaters. Yelick, however, slanted his characterization to meet the storyline expected by his readership rather than to reflect the experience of the attendees.

Second: His greatest bit of misreporting regards the incident in which I turned down Mr. Spencer’s and Mr. Lewis’ microphones. I did not turn down the microphones (on both participants, by the way) because of Spencer’s “anti-Islamic rants” as Yelick claimed. Let me explain why. In 25 years of broadcasting, I have occasionally turned down a speaker’s microphone if he was talking over the host or another guest. This is no judgment on the speaker. Because speakers are focused on making their points, they don’t always heed the host/moderator’s attempts to move on. Why did I want to move on? My prosaic reason, I’m afraid, will disappoint Mr. Yelick.

Mr. Spencer claimed a particular terrorist had appealed to Islam to justify his actions. Mr. Lewis denied it. Mr. Spencer restated it. Mr. Lewis, again denied it. You get the picture? Mr. Spencer then revealed that there was a video that could settle this question. This is where I stepped in. I said that since this was an empirical question that any “jackass” could settle later that night by going on YouTube, it was time to get to other questions. To inflate this into a judgment on Mr. Spencer’s or Mr. Lewis’ presentation is ludicrous. Both conducted themselves like men convinced of their positions but as gentlemen. They often deferred to one another and were far easier to moderate than most candidates on the campaign trail.

During Saturday’s debate, one of the presenters, a Muslim Turkish columnist said: “Media does not always make misunderstanding disappear.” I couldn’t agree more. Some of Mr. Yelick’s reporting on the Saturday debate only compounds the misunderstandings the debate was intended to eliminate. I invite him or any of Mr. Spencer’s critics to join me on my daily radio broadcast heard on over 230 stations and on Sirius Satellite radio to show us anything from Mr. Spencer’s books or public speeches that can be fairly called “anti-Islamic rants.” I don’t think it can be done. But have at it. I’m game.


Leave a Reply